David Hines (hradzka) wrote,
David Hines

the trade paperback

burger_eater posted a link to Tor's Tom Doherty on sales in trade and mass-market paperbacks. Doherty is concerned with the decline of traditional mass-market outlets, because it means losing lots of impulse buyers -- and potential repeat customers.

Which is all well and good, but it prompts me to ask: am I the only person who *hates* the trade paperback format? Like, SERIOUS HATE, if I had my druthers IT WOULD NOT EXIST AND THE PERSON WHO INVENTED IT WOULD BE FLOGGED. Ahem. But seriously, I do hate the trade paperback really a lot. I think it's a stupid idea: it lacks the durability of the hardback and the portability of true paperback, which means somebody sometime had the bright idea to annoy customers by combining the inconveniences of both formats and charging an in-between price for it. This may be convenient to the seller's profit margin, but it sure as hell doesn't meet my needs, and I don't buy trade paperbacks if I can get the book in some more intelligent cover. The only thing trade paper is good for is comic books. Text? If I want Serious Durability, hardcover. If I'm going somewhere with it, give me old-school paperbacks, every time.

Does anyone else feel this way? Or am I alone?
Tags: books

  • female athletic poses

    I've thought for a while that scanty female clothing in comics isn't nearly as much of a problem as the porntastic posing. There are male superheroes…

  • i get the feeling a lot of people could use a smile

    So without further ado, here's Ty Templeton's Big Hat Dog. Via this page on Templeton's blog. Templeton's best known for BATMAN ADVENTURES and…

  • that CAPTAIN AMERICA thing

    Short shameful confession: I was actually sorely tempted to get into a Twitterfight with Gail Simone recently over the recent kerfuffle over an issue…

  • Post a new comment


    Comments allowed for friends only

    Anonymous comments are disabled in this journal

    default userpic

    Your IP address will be recorded