Log in

No account? Create an account
David Hines [userpic]

DOLLHOUSE pilot and SCC: "The Good Wound"

February 15th, 2009 (10:49 am)
Tags: ,

My Valentine's Day: I went kite flying, got a gun out of the repair shop, and caught up on the TV I missed Friday because I went to catch the new FRIDAY THE 13TH. (Short verdict: different, but not a bad reinterpretation; the kills are pretty good, some very good, and Derek Mears gives good Jason.)

"Ghost," by Joss Whedon
rating: **1/2

Call it in the neighborhood of two and a half to three stars. It definitely has its good points, but the show really is a mixed bag. I think the biggest problem is its too-stagey atmospherics; Whedon is deliberately trying to make the Dollhouse seem off-kilter and creepy, but he really doesn't have to. As the obsessive FBI agent notes, these people are essentially living murder victims who have their personalities obliterated and fake ones put on. That is plenty creepy enough. You don't need your dialogue to be slightly stilted, your actors to play scenes as if they're somewhat off. Because it's *already* off. In fact, if they'd played the Dollhouse as straight, like any other office, it would have been nineteen times creepier: it's always the monstrous things done with a calm, reassuring smile *and no sense that anything wrong is happening* that are the worst.

There were some other false notes -- in particular, the kickboxing match was, um, heavy-handed and then some. It did get across a point about the character, but JESUS, Joss, hammer it home much? But "Ghost" wasn't a terribly bad start, and while I didn't think the gimmick could be interesting, the revelations about how the process works leads to some intriguing questions. To me, the fascinating part is the revelation that the Actives' implanted personalities are based on scans of *actual people.* That opens up tons of questions. How the hell does that work? Do they pay to license people's memories and personalities? Do the people know what they're doing it for? How long can they store this stuff? How much detail do the memories hold? Does an Active under the impression that it's a particular person ever decide to, say, check its email? Echo's Ellie Penn persona was based on a person who'd committed suicide at least a year before, which means she was scanned considerably before that -- do they get time lapse problems? Are they unsettled by changing technology, changing terminology? Do the personas have a shelf life? How far back do they go?

I think mix-and-match has to be used far more often than the pilot indicates; after all, the idea of the Dollhouse is that its superrich clientele can get *exactly* what they want, and you'd think that if every such delivery is based on one person the Dollhouse would get out of memory transfer and into the personals business. But the "existing individuals" transplant, I think, is more likely to suggest effective stories. Here are two gimmicks that leap into my head right away:

* A Dollhouse client is screwed up, betrayed a trust or something, ruined a relationship beyond repair -- and knows that the lost love was the subject of a personality scan. And becomes a regular client to get that lost love back, just for a little while, maybe one weekend a month. But makes the same mistakes again, and again, and again...

* Somebody who knows something very, very important was scanned for, say, the first or second ever such scan. And it becomes important for some reason to have access to that person and the information in his/her head. (Perhaps the original has died in the intervening years -- or, more disturbingly, the original can't be trusted and the Active is to be used to find out if the original is lying about something important.) So the Active feels like a person out of time.


SCC: "The Good Wound"
by Ashley Miller and Zack Stentz
rating: ***1/2

Okay, yeah, I think we can officially say the show is firing on all cylinders. Jesus Christ.

"The Good Wound" does a lot of the stuff that the best episodes to date have done, and it does them extremely well -- so well that I'd say it's the show's new best episode. It uses the techniques that have worked very well for the show so far to terrific effect, and in the tradition of the show playing off the first two films, it picks up a cut bit that was one of James Cameron's rare false notes and does a better job with it.

I mentioned before that I think the show is at its best when its characters have different agendas and different plots to be in. "The Good Wound" bears that out. John has his storyline, and Cameron is with him; Riley has her storyline, and Jesse is with her; Sarah has her storyline, and Felicia (and Kyle) are with her; and Derek goes between John's story and Sarah's. It's very well played. Curiously, the show seems to be on its best game in scenes that have only two people in them; this episode gave us lots of those, and they worked great.

I was especially impressed with how well Kyle Reese was handled. Sarah's hallucination of Kyle is based on a cut scene from T2, where he comes to her in the mental hospital. Linda Hamilton strongly objected to this scene, and she was right to, because it doesn't play well and undercuts Sarah's character in the rest of the movie. Basically, Kyle tells her to be strong, and she's very shaken -- more T1 Sarah than T2 Sarah. It's great to see Michael Biehn, but it feels like a false note given her characterization in the rest of the film. And to his credit, Cameron realized this, and cut it.

In "The Good Wound," Kyle's not really a character in his own right as much as he is a dramatization of Sarah's own internal conflict. David Gerrold noted that one reason STAR TREK: TOS worked so well is that McCoy and Spock, being emotional and logical, respectively, would demonstrate Kirk's own internal conflict during their discussions of what to do. And it plays effectively here because -- unlike in James Cameron's scene -- Kyle is not just telling Sarah to man up. He tells her to trust Felicia, to be more compassionate. This means that the scene does not play with Sarah as a wuss, which is what Linda Hamilton's very accurate criticism of the scene in T2 was. That the guest actor playing Kyle is really very good does not hurt in the slightest. Nor does Lena Headey's excellent performance -- I am bugged by Sarah's walking on that leg, but the episode balances it out a bit by showing that yes, a gunshot wound to the leg is serious and potentially fatal, and yes, it really hurts a lot.

(A quick side note: one of SCC's best features is that the show is not stingy with its guest stars. They give them real screen time to work with. Felicia, the doctor Sarah abducts, has a great guest role and the actress is terrific in it, and even the cops, who have much less screen time, get scenes where we get to see them thinking about what they're doing. This is something that I really like to see on TV, and it's a great feature for SCC. The other characters have their own agendas, and they're not stupid about implementing them. Good for the guest stars' demo reels, too.)

"The Good Wound" also continues the show's improving treatment of John Connor. The hospital scene with Derek Reese and John is very strong, and it makes for a more convincing young John than we saw first season. This John doesn't pout or whine when Derek tells him he shouldn't have brought Riley to the hospital -- he takes charge, takes responsibility, says he made the call and he'll stick by it. But what makes the scene really work is that when the news about Sarah comes in and John wants to change his mind, Derek makes him eat his own words, and stick to his existing plan. John isn't dumb here. John is smart, and John is strong, and Derek outthinks him anyway. That's how the show needs to be playing John. He's not whiny, he's not ineffective, he's just learning.

(Also: I love Cameron's observation when John asks what future him would do in this situation: "Future you has more important things to do." Dead on.)

I haven't even mentioned the scenes between John Henry and Ellison, or John Henry and Weaver; they were all really solid, with the JH/Ellison scenes in particular being a real standout -- John Henry is really terrific, and I like this role for the actor much better than I ever did Cromartie. The scenes between JH and Weaver are very good, though not as strong; the dialogue is very effective, but while Shirley Manson has had some quite good moments on the series, her overall performance is just not strong enough to let her go toe-to-toe with the cast members who are, y'know, actually *actors.* She's at her best when she's most human -- the video flashbacks, Weaver pretending to remember her childhood -- which, unfortunately, is not the majority of what the role requires. I guess Manson's continued tenure will depend on the writing staff's plans, but I do kind of hope her identity is compromised and she has to start a new one next season, assuming she survives this one. Hey, a regeneration worked magnificently for Cromartie.

(Also: have I mentioned how much I like Jesse? Really. Terrific actress, and the character's ruthlessness is striking and effective. More of her!)

Anyway: really solid this week, just all around well-done. By George, I think they've got it.


Posted by: amonitrate (amonitrate)
Posted at: February 15th, 2009 06:13 pm (UTC)

totally agree on all counts. Fantastic episode of SCC. I'm even starting to like John, and up to about a few episodes ago he mostly annoyed me.

Posted by: beatrice_otter (beatrice_otter)
Posted at: February 15th, 2009 06:27 pm (UTC)

I've started to get into T:SCC myself; this is the first ep I watched on TV instead of DVD or online.

And, yeah, it's awesome. I think it's my favorite of all the shows out there right now.

Well. BSG had a great episode this week, which balances out much of the crappiness of the last few episodes. So I guess they're my favorite of the current batch at the moment. (But not if they keep pulling crap while SCC stays flying high.)

Posted by: zackstentz (zackstentz)
Posted at: February 16th, 2009 05:23 am (UTC)


Thanks as always for the thoughtful and perceptive review (even when I disagree, you always give me something to think about or consider from a different angle.) One note-- while Shirley is not the most experienced of our actors, she's getting better and better through a combination of hard work and getting to play scenes opposite Garrett Dillahunt and Richard T. Jones-- a master class if ever there was one. And she moves absolutely beautifully. Her runway model walk through the factory as she went on her murder spree was a thing of beauty.

Zack Stentz

P.S. I was half-watching Dollhouse but might have missed a plot point-- why did they use Echo for the hostage negotiation and not an actual hostage negotiator? I didn't understand what the advantage was.

Posted by: David Hines (hradzka)
Posted at: February 16th, 2009 07:24 am (UTC)
catwoman and holly

I didn't understand what the advantage was.

It enabled them to have a show. Duh, Zack!

It is a dumbness. Whedon tried to hang a lamp on that one. It's stated that the client isn't just coming to the Dollhouse out of the blue; he's been to them before, and they've done unspecified stuff for him. So he wants absolute discretion, people he's familiar with -- ergo, Dollhouse. Which is *still* dumb, being as the guy is Mexican and rich and so should have hostage negotiators on speed dial, but Whedon does sorta realize this and tries to make it the client's dumb decision.

Dillahunt and Jones are definitely a great acting duo -- actors either have scene chemistry or they don't, and those guys really play off each other well. I don't know where you guys are going with them, but I'm along for the ride.

Posted by: Jayman (smjayman)
Posted at: February 16th, 2009 10:43 pm (UTC)

My wife opined, and I am inclined to agree, that Dollhouse has one major flaw. With the main character being some imprinted pattern every week, we'll never get attached or like any single person because they'll be different every damn time.

5 Read Comments